HOME|BIOGRAPHY|COLLECTIONS|EXHIBITIONS|LITERATURE|ARTWORKS|PROJECTS|EDITIONS/PUBLICATIONS

texts and contributions

  • 1969 :: poem for everyone
  • no-
    tes
    for a
    random
    reader.
    interrela-
    tions of
    words. re-
    ducing our lan-
    guage material
    to semantic signs
    free associations
    give new ideas. free-
    ing language from
    everyday meanings means
    liberation through means
    of language. // to change
    language in a changing
    world. a language which re-
    stricts thinking to conven-
    tions is no longer applicable.
    so a few will use language, not
    only as a game, not only because
    of a formalistic need to experi-
    ment, but using it according to ba-
    koenin because "the wish to destroy
    is at the same time a creative wish".
    // can we say tyhat our society is in
    good order? is it not rather a complexui
    ty of mostly un- or badly coordinated sub-
    orders at cross-purposes, hardly touching
    each other (in the clearest of cases), which
    are completely arbitrary and exist historical-
    ly a-synchronically? komplexity, it might be bet-
    ter to aim at a flexible multi-form society, which
    because of inevitable partial information will al-
    ways try for relative positions, rather than to think
    in terms of order. // chance, wonderful word to disco-
    ver. // a word, a phrase are like a skin.they are the
    wrapping with which we indicate more than we really
    know. a word would be a speculation towards reality, if
    we didn't use it according to agreement. a word is an a-
    greement as to meaning and correlation. language is one of
    our possibilities to have a grip on reality. words, language
    participate in this reality. breaking off the agreement means
    changing reality, in other words participating by working with
    it. the changing of a part of reality is taking it for what it
    is worth - real - ity - realness - each realness brings change. eve-
    ry change brings realness. // constructive thinking cannot use con-
    formism because this is a limitation undermining independence and
    reducing the possibility of independence and reducing the possibility
    of added value. // when talking about language a vocabulary is used that
    is excellent for other means of communication as for instance a figure.
    // psychologically we need means to identification corresponding to our
    way of life and present environment. especially for art this is a question
    of experiment and integration to find this means and use them. // one point
    is decisive for the space around itself, give tension to it. // meaning and
    truth are not connected a priori. // why should it use as criterium for work a
    unity of an image because formulating, finding a given form is so important for
    me? an a-form is also a form and certainly a formulation.// it is often thought
    that rationalism can only be used in connection with commerce and sometimes scien-
    ce. this is a concept which divides culture and places art outside active life. // to
    stay young we need only follow the avant garde. they represent grosso modo the thoughts
    of our time in its changes and dynamics. the problem is knowing what the avant-garde is
    knowing what the avant-garde is at a given moment.     herman de vries
  • top
  • TEXT CREDITS
    herman de vries, 'poem for everyone = et digt til alle', in exhibition information Panel 13 Information n° 3 (1969). Reprinted in to be (Stuttgart 1995) 70.

  • Click on the image to enlarge!